Mixed plaque on coronary CT angiography predicts atherosclerotic events in asymptomatic intermediate-risk individuals.

OBJECTIVE: Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) permits both qualitative and quantitative analysis of atherosclerotic plaque and may be a suitable risk modifier in assessing patients at intermediate risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. We sought to determine the association of plaque components with long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in asymptomatic intermediate-risk patients, compared with conventional coronary artery calcium (CAC) score. METHODS: 100 intermediate-risk patients underwent double-blinded CCTA. Follow-up was conducted at 10 years and data were cross-referenced with the National Death Index. The primary outcome was MACE, which was a composite of death, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), revascularisation and stroke. RESULTS: The median time from CCTA to follow-up was 9.5 years. 83 patients completed follow-up interview and mortality data were available on all 100 patients. MACE occurred in 17 (20.5%) patients, which included 2 (2%) deaths, 8 (10%) ACS, 3 (4%) strokes and 5 (6%) revascularisation procedures. 47 (57%) patients had mixed plaque, which was predictive of MACE (OR 4.68 (95% CI 1.19 to 18.5) p=0.028). The burden of non-calcified and mixed plaque, defined by non-calcified plaque segment stenosis score, was also a predictor of long-term MACE (OR 1.59 (95% CI 1.18 to 2.13) p=0.002). Neither calcified plaque (OR 3.92 (95% CI 0.80 to 19.3)) nor CAC score (OR 1.01 (95% CI 0.999 to 1.02)) was associated with long-term MACE. CONCLUSION: The presence and burden of mixed plaque on CCTA is associated with an increased risk of long-term MACE among asymptomatic intermediate-risk patients and is a superior predictor to CAC score.

Dedicated Next Day Discharge Post Minimalist TAVI: The Tasmanian Experience.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety, feasibility and independent predictors of next day discharge (NDD) in patients undergoing minimalist transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for severe aortic stenosis (AS) in a real-world Australian population. METHODS: This single centre study reviewed 135 consecutive patients who underwent minimalist transfemoral TAVI from June 2020 to February 2022. Baseline demographics, procedural characteristic and outcomes were obtained. All patients were assessed by the local protocol for NDD. Patients were then divided into two groups: those who achieved next day discharge (NDD) and those requiring >1 overnight hospital stay. Univariate, bivariate and stepwise multivariate logistic regression modelling was used to identify the predictors of successful next day discharge. RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 82.9±5.7 years with 62.3% patients male, the average STS score was 4.1±2.4. All 135 patients underwent a successful transfemoral TAVI procedure, with 131 (97%) receiving a balloon-expandable valve. Ninety-seven (97) (71.9%) patients achieved NDD. Thirty (30)-day outcomes were excellent with a 30-day mortality of 0.7%, transient ischaemic attack/cardiovascular accident (TIA/CVA) 1.5%, major vascular complication 1.5% and 11.4% need for permanent pacemaker (PPM). In patients not achieving NDD, the average length of stay (LOS) was 3.0 days. Baseline characteristics demonstrated pre-existing first degree atrioventricular (AV) block and right bundle branch block (RBBB) as statistically significant negative predictors of NDD on univariate analysis. Next day discharge was achievable in only 50% of patients who suffered any minor or major procedural complication (15/30). Stepwise multivariate logistic regression modelling demonstrated female gender (OR 3.094, 95% CI 1.141-8.391, p=0.026), smaller aortic valve area (AVA) (OR 48.265, 95% CI 2.269-102.6, p=0.013), the presence of diabetes mellitus (OR 0.594, 95% CI 0.356-0.991, p=0.046) and a longer procedure time (OR 0.960, 95% CI 0.935-0.986, p=0.002) as statistically significant negative predictors of NDD. In addition, there was no difference in 30-day readmission rates between the NDD and non-NDD cohort (7.2% vs 10.5%, p=0.386). CONCLUSION: Next day discharge is safe and feasible in almost three quarters of patients undergoing minimalist TAVI for severe AS in a predominantly balloon expandable valve cohort, with a very low rate of 30-day readmission. NDD provides advantages for hospital efficiency and improved cost-effectiveness. Female gender, smaller AVA, the presence of diabetes mellitus and a longer procedure time were independent negative predictors of successful NDD.

Chest keloids: effect of surgical excision and adjuvant radiotherapy on recurrence, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chest keloids are a difficult sub-group of scars to treat, likely secondary to the high wound tension in the area that promotes excessive fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition. Excision and adjuvant radiotherapy has been demonstrated as an efficacious treatment for keloids in general, but no meta-analysis exists to support the claims for chest keloids. This study aims to identify the rate of recurrence after surgical resection and radiotherapy on patients with chest keloids. METHODS: A search was performed using Embase, MEDLINE, Pubmed and Cochrane database on 22 December 2018 for terms 'radiotherapy', 'keloid' and 'chest'. Papers included met a prospectively designed inclusion criteria assessed by multiple investigators. RESULTS: Twelve studies, including 1 randomized controlled trial, were included for a total of 400 patients with a chest keloid scar managed with surgical excision and adjuvant radiotherapy. Overall pooled-estimate of recurrence rate was 22% (95% CI 12-32%). Meta-regression did not demonstrate a significant effect for method of wound closure, type of radiotherapy, radiotherapy dose (BED10 ) and study type. CONCLUSION: Excision and adjuvant radiotherapy represents an effective method of treatment for chest keloids, however sufficient prospective data, including randomized controlled trials, did not yet exist to support these findings. Further studies with sufficient sub-group analysis for keloid location are required to add to the pool of literature that can be added to this meta-analysis.

Activity of Inflammatory Bowel Disease After Liver Transplantation for Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Predicts Poorer Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The impact of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity on long-term outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is unknown. We examined the impact of post-LT IBD activity on clinically significant outcomes. METHODS: One hundred twelve patients undergoing LT for PSC from 2 centers were studied for a median of 7 years. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to their IBD activity after LT: no IBD, mild IBD, and moderate to severe IBD. Patients were classified as having moderate to severe IBD if they met at least 1 of 3 criteria: (i) Mayo 2 or 3 colitis or Simple Endoscopic Score-Crohn's Disease ≥7 on endoscopy; (ii) acute flare of IBD necessitating steroid rescue therapy; or (iii) post-LT colectomy for medically refractory IBD. RESULTS: Moderate to severe IBD at any time post-transplant was associated with a higher risk of Clostridium difficile infection (27% vs 8% mild IBD vs 8% no IBD; P = 0.02), colorectal cancer/high-grade dysplasia (21% vs 3% both groups; P = 0.004), post-LT colectomy (33% vs 3% vs 0%) and rPSC (64% vs 18% vs 20%; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that moderate to severe IBD increased the risk of both rPSC (relative risk [RR], 8.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.81-27.59; P < 0.001) and colorectal cancer/high-grade dysplasia (RR, 10.45; 95% CI, 3.55-22.74; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate to severe IBD at any time post-LT is associated with a higher risk of rPSC and colorectal neoplasia compared with mild IBD and no IBD. Patients with no IBD and mild IBD have similar post-LT outcomes. Future prospective studies are needed to determine if more intensive treatment of moderate to severe IBD improves long-term outcomes in patients undergoing LT for PSC.

Clinical outcomes of self-expandable vs. balloon-expandable TAVI for severe aortic stenosis.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established therapy for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). There is limited data exploring differences in outcomes post-TAVI SEV vs. BEV. This study compared procedural success and 30-d clinical outcomes self-expandable valves (SEV), vs. balloon-expandable valves (BEV) for patients with severe AS.Methods: Retrospective analysis was undertaken of patients receiving TAVI at St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne between August 2009 and May 2018. The primary endpoints included procedural success, clinical outcomes and complication rates at 30-d.Results: Out of 151 patients undergoing TAVI, 70 received (46.3%) SEV (Medtronic CoreValve & Evolut-R) and 81 (53.6%) BEV (Edwards SAPIEN-XT & S3). The mean Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) risk score did not differ between the groups, SEV (83.6 ± 4.9 years, STS 4.4 ± 3.8) compared to BEV (82.3 ± 5.8 years, STS 4.9 ± 4.9). Procedural success was similar SEV 67 (95.7%) vs. BEV 78 (96.3%). Rates of ≥ moderate paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) at 30-d were significantly higher in SEV compared to BEV (6.7 vs. 0.0%; p = .02). SEV patients had higher rates of pacemaker insertion (36.4 vs. 9.5%; p = .001) and stroke rates (12.4 vs. 1.4%; p = .04) compared to BEV patients. The difference in 30-d mortality between the two groups was similar (SEV 4.6% vs. BEV 1.3%; p = .23).Conclusions: This real-world retrospective analysis demonstrates higher rates of ≥ moderate PAR, stroke and pacemaker insertion with SEV compared to BEV at 30 d post-TAVI for severe symptomatic AS.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis in the Australian regional population.

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical and functional outcomes of regional and urban patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis. METHODS: Data were collected at patient follow-up post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation at 30 days and 12 months. Patients were stratified by residential postcodes into remoteness areas using the Australian Statistical Geography Standard. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single-centre tertiary referral hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (n = 142) from 2009 to 2018 were analysed, with 77 patients (54.2%) residing in regional Victoria and New South Wales. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Procedural success, adverse event rates, readmission rates, mortality rates, loss to follow-up and functional improvement. RESULTS: Patients residing in regional areas had a lower mean age (81.8 vs 83.7 years) and proportion of Stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease (1.3% vs 9.2%), compared with urban patients. Procedural characteristics and immediate post-procedural outcomes were similar between both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality, readmission rates or loss to follow-up between the two cohorts. Regional patients demonstrated poorer rates of functional improvement at 30 days (50.7% vs 67.7%); however, this difference was not sustained at 12 months (79.2% vs 71.0%). Frailty was demonstrated to be an independent predictor of poor 30-day functional improvement. CONCLUSION: Regional patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis have non-inferior 30-day and 12-month outcomes, when compared with urban patients. Frailty is a predictor of poor functional improvement post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Outcomes of incidental findings on multi-detector computed tomography for transcatheter aortic valve implantation assessment: A single-centre study and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) require multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) when considered for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Incidental findings on MDCT are common given the age group and region imaged. Our aim was to evaluate the frequency and outcome of incidental findings (IF) identified on MDCT and the impact on survival. METHODS: This single-centre analysis retrospectively reviewed severe AS patients who underwent MDCT during TAVI workup. MDCT reports were reviewed for any IF and defined into three categories: IF of no relevant clinical significance (IF-NoCS), IF of non-immediate clinical significance (IF-NICS) and IF of immediate clinical significance (IF-ICS). Demographics, follow-up of IF and survival were calculated from MDCT date. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-five patients underwent MDCT for TAVI suitability (mean age 83 ± 6 years, 52% male). The majority proceeded to TAVI (65%). Renal lesions (25%) and lung nodules (18%) were the most common IF. Fifty-nine patients (22%) had IF-NICS; 39% (23/59) were benign, 59% were not further investigated and one patient had suspected lung cancer. Six patients (2.3%) had IF-ICS and all were diagnosed with lung cancer. During a median follow-up of 272 days, there was no survival difference between patients with IF-ICS or IF-NICS versus patients without IF or IF-NoCS in the overall cohort (P = 0.44) or in TAVI patients (P = 0.88). CONCLUSION: Incidental findings on MDCT are common with one-quarter having IF-ICS or IF-NCIS. Most patients with IF-NICS did not undergo further investigation. Standardized reporting of MDCT may assist in clarifying the need for further investigation which will in turn influence decision and timing to proceed with TAVI.

Higher long-term adherence to statins in rural patients at high atherosclerotic risk.

BACKGROUND: Rural patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) experience greater cardiovascular morbidity and mortality than their urban counterparts. Statin therapy is a key component of ASCVD treatment. The extent to which there may be regional differences in long-term adherence to statins is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess long-term rates of adherence to statins in a high-risk ASCVD cohort, and whether regional differences exist between rural and urban patients. METHODS: Follow-up was conducted in patients who underwent coronary angiography at a single tertiary center between 2009 and 2013. Adherence was defined as consumption of prescribed statin ≥6 days per week. Patients were divided into remoteness areas (RAs), classified as RA1 (major city), RA2 (inner regional), and RA3 (outer regional) based on the Australian Standard Geographical Classification. RESULTS: Five hundred twenty-five patients (69% male, mean age 64 ± 11 years) were followed-up after a median of 5.3 years. Baseline characteristics were similar between RAs. Overall adherence was 83%; however, rural patients were significantly more adherent to their statin therapy (80% in RA1, 83% in RA2, and 93% in RA3, P = .04). Living in RA3 independently predicted greater statin adherence than living in RA1 (odds ratio: 2.75, 95% CI: 1.1-7.8, P = .03). All-cause mortality was significantly higher in RA3 than other regional areas (6% RA1, 12% RA2, and 18% RA3, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher all-cause mortality, rural patients with ASCVD demonstrate significantly greater long-term adherence to statins than urban patients. Other factors, such as reduced access to health care and delayed diagnosis may explain the gap in outcomes between rural and urban patients.